Tuesday, October 4, 2016

Podcasting, when Visual Aids are not needed, or impossible.

I have always viewed the use of audio and video aids for learning to be highly valuable to learners because it is, essentially, a transmission of information that is NOT dependent on the learners ability to comprehend written text.  Naturally, I believe all students can and should learn to read, but in some cases the ability to understand printed text is not as efficient for all learners as listening or seeing visually.  The article, "Podcasting for online learners with vision loss" (2013), is an excellent example of how information can be transmitted without text.  Information can be delivered to people who are either not capable of seeing, or who's ability to see restricts the amount of information they can absorb.

In some cases step by step written procedures are not nearly as handy as being able to SHOW a user how to accomplish a task.  For example, this is a quick video on how to use K-State interlibrary loan procedure to request books, documents, and learning media from other libraries around the country.  The video is efficient, and although it has no sound, is able to demonstrate to users exactly how to operate the interlibrary loan program.  I personnaly have used youtube to learn things that written instructions might make complicated, like how to repair the hard drive in a MacBook Air, or how to replace a garbage disposal in a kitchen sink.

I see two potential problems with audio and video podcasting.  Audio podcasting maybe cheap and easy to deliver with his compacted bitrate and therefore quick downloads, but if visual cues are necessary and absent then learning is diminished.  While studying at the University of Northern Colorado I studied the history of the middle east in great lengths, without visual representation of objects, and practices that were completely unlike western culture I was not completely grasping the subject of the audio podcast.  If audio podcasts are to be used, more descriptive language is needed.  Listening to the news without the visual images to accompany it is not effective.

The second potential problem is that learning takes some interaction.  King and Cox (2011) touch on this subject on page 37, if a learner is simply reviewing information they may retain little of it, there must be some purpose, some objective, and then an assessment or check for understanding.  If education was just watching media presentations, we would not need teachers and classrooms would be taught by recordings only.  There must be some instruction as well as presentation of information.

King, K. & Cox, T. (2011). The professor’s guide to taming technology. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Kim, D. (2011). Incorporating podcasting and blogging into a core task for ESOL teacher candidates. Computers & Education, 56(3), 632-641.

Whetstone, K., Mayberry, Ed, Czelusniak, Vernon, & Hartshorne, Richard. (2013). Podcasting for Online Learners with Vision Loss: A Descriptive Study, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.


6 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. kouljackson,

    According to King and Cox (2011), asynchronous audio communication has been shown to be an effective instructional strategy capable of enhancing teaching presence, fostering collaboration, increasing interactivity and retention of course material. However, I do agree that recorded lessons without the facilitation of the instructor or any kind of check on learning or defined objectives leads a student to not even bother to listen to the podcast. Instructors must be able to strike a balance with the facilitation of instruction and implementation of podcasts in order for effective learning to transpire.


    Danella
    King, K. P., & Cox, T. D. (Eds.). (2011). The professor's guide to taming technology: Leveraging digital media, Web 2.0, and more for learning. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. You bring up some really interesting points. While audio might work best for certain learners (those who are visually impaired, have dyslexia, or just rely strongly on their auditory sense for learning), many others would benefit from a visual or kinesthetic component. Your post made me think of the youtube videos I rely on when I need to figure out HOW to do something. Among other things, I’ve used youtube to learn how to make an Excel grade book. I can WATCH and LISTEN. I can stop the video and DO the steps right along with the instructor. It’s perfect! I was trying to find out if youtube would be considered a podcast, and came across a website discussing how youtube can be used WITH a podcast (and, because I was impressed with the link to your video, I tried to link the website 4 times, but wasn’t successful - as you can see from my deleted posts). The nuances of the technologies are a bit confusing to me, so I’m trying not to get bogged down with the terms and details, and just trying to make “sense of it through my own lens,” as Dr. K. would say! Thank you for making me think and learn:)
    Here’s the website I wasn’t able to link (but I’ll keep trying!) https://theaudacitytopodcast.com/youtube-with-podcasting-and-growing-your-podcast-audience-tap186/

    ReplyDelete